More: The idea is the voter should picture images of the Rodney King riots, and vote Obama if they know what is good for their health. The Obama nation is depicted as a vengeful one, filled with raging supporters who will take to the streets in unlawful acts of pillaging and mayhem.
I can just picture Pepe running around Nawlins, pillaging and ululating.
And here was Erica Jong's reaction to 9/11: I have always had fantasies of New York felled by nuclear bombs, flooded by rising sea level, toppled by meteors if not by terrorists. I always knew our grandeur might well be fleeting. […] I have always been able to imagine a crater where New York City used to be. Now everyone else can imagine it too.
Susan Sontag, Pepe's dear friend, on Western Civilization:
The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean Algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, and Balanchine ballets don't redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history.
While at it, this is what Susie had to say about 9/11: The voices licensed to follow the event seem to have joined together in a campaign to infantilize the public. Where is the acknowledgment that this was not a "cowardly" attack on "civilization" or "liberty" or "humanity" or "the free world" but an attack on the world's self-proclaimed superpower, undertaken as a consequence of specific American alliances and actions? How many citizens are aware of the ongoing American bombing of Iraq? And if the word "cowardly" is to be used, it might be more aptly applied to those who kill from beyond the range of retaliation, high in the sky, than to those willing to die themselves in order to kill others. In the matter of courage (a morally neutral virtue): whatever may be said of the perpetrators of Tuesday's slaughter, they were not cowards.
The weekly standard references Sontag's reference to Norman Mailer, but then doesn't follow it up with anything else. In that, it somewhat suggests Norman Mailer wasn't cool. Which is wrong: he was quite the libertarian.
Pepe: if it was a non-pinko making that comment, and the color had been inverted, would you have so cavalierly attributed the (published) statement to a typo? Of course not. But the beauty of being a pinko is precisely never, ever having to worry about such peccadilloes: a pinko can (and will) sday the most abject things, with absolute impunity. C'est la règle du jeu.
14 comments:
Gloriously fevered and hilarious. The tse tse flies are at it again in Pepeland.
PMS=Pepean mato syndrome?
More: The idea is the voter should picture images of the Rodney King riots, and vote Obama if they know what is good for their health. The Obama nation is depicted as a vengeful one, filled with raging supporters who will take to the streets in unlawful acts of pillaging and mayhem.
I can just picture Pepe running around Nawlins, pillaging and ululating.
And here was Erica Jong's reaction to 9/11: I have always had fantasies of New York felled by nuclear bombs, flooded by rising sea level, toppled by meteors if not by terrorists. I always knew our grandeur might well be fleeting. […] I have always been able to imagine a crater where New York City used to be. Now everyone else can imagine it too.
Aahhh, the discrete charm of Pinkoland.
Hum. Losing to whom exactly - Palin-BobDole resurrected?
Ask your pals -- Erica Jong, Susan Sontag, Jane Fonda, etc.
All fine women as far as I know.
Susan Sontag, Pepe's dear friend, on Western Civilization:
The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean Algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, and Balanchine ballets don't redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history.
Pepe's guiding principle, in a nutshell.
While at it, this is what Susie had to say about 9/11:
The voices licensed to follow the event seem to have joined together in a campaign to infantilize the public. Where is the acknowledgment that this was not a "cowardly" attack on "civilization" or "liberty" or "humanity" or "the free world" but an attack on the world's self-proclaimed superpower, undertaken as a consequence of specific American alliances and actions? How many citizens are aware of the ongoing American bombing of Iraq? And if the word "cowardly" is to be used, it might be more aptly applied to those who kill from beyond the range of retaliation, high in the sky, than to those willing to die themselves in order to kill others. In the matter of courage (a morally neutral virtue): whatever may be said of the perpetrators of Tuesday's slaughter, they were not cowards.
Isn't this the Party Line in Pinkoland?
What's wrong with Norman Mailer?
Nothing wrong -- except that he is no longer among us.
The weekly standard references Sontag's reference to Norman Mailer, but then doesn't follow it up with anything else. In that, it somewhat suggests Norman Mailer wasn't cool. Which is wrong: he was quite the libertarian.
Pepe: if it was a non-pinko making that comment, and the color had been inverted, would you have so cavalierly attributed the (published) statement to a typo? Of course not. But the beauty of being a pinko is precisely never, ever having to worry about such peccadilloes: a pinko can (and will) sday the most abject things, with absolute impunity. C'est la règle du jeu.
Post a Comment