Still, they had an impact like the Vikings, where the brunt was felt initially, but once in power the Ericcsons and Khans did such a good job assimilating that all that remains now are horrific memories — unless one is Mongol or Viking.
I don't remember if I mentioned this before, but Ghengis Khan is revered today because Soviet historians had interpreted him as a feudalistic warlord throughout the 20th century. Nostalgia is such a dangerous thing. It seems there's room for a good critique of Ghengis Khan without having to approach the subject with a Marxist/Leninist lens.
5 comments:
The illusion of Revolution seems to be a recurring theme in Russian history: from Czars to Totalitarians to Putin-style Democracy.
This evolutionary theory has also taught us to never start a land-war in Asia.
the Mongols did alright with one...
Still, they had an impact like the Vikings, where the brunt was felt initially, but once in power the Ericcsons and Khans did such a good job assimilating that all that remains now are horrific memories — unless one is Mongol or Viking.
I don't remember if I mentioned this before, but Ghengis Khan is revered today because Soviet historians had interpreted him as a feudalistic warlord throughout the 20th century. Nostalgia is such a dangerous thing. It seems there's room for a good critique of Ghengis Khan without having to approach the subject with a Marxist/Leninist lens.
Yeh. Russians still carry the Stalin posters...
Russians still carry the Stalin posters...
Another classic case of the dangers inherent in Romanticism and nostalgia. "Bad air! Bad air!" as Nietzsche put it.
Post a Comment