Tuesday, December 08, 2009

Dry run

UPDATE: Tecs and AA's brains on dry run.

JIHAD!!
Posted by at
Labels: ,

10 comments:

Mr roT said...

I don't think it was a dry run. There's no way that the rags would make themselves so obvious or obnoxious for the real thing, so this was no test.

It was just a bunch of assholes that should be put in jail for a couple years with guys that like to play house.

How it is possible that the TSA would put these guys back on the plane, though?

That's moronic.

12/03/2009 3:13 PM
Mr roT said...

One commenter says they're "feeling their oats."

Goddamn right they are with Obama in the WH.

12/03/2009 3:14 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...

Hey, Tecumseh, a dry run needs a bottle or two, and proper grub, to bring an end to the Rott. You game for next weekend sometime?

12/03/2009 6:42 PM
Tecumseh said...

Sounds great. Right now I'm on the road, but that's it, I'll stay put for a while, I need to recharge my batteries after all this bouncing around, Rott-like. Not this weekend, but weekend after, right?

12/03/2009 7:42 PM
Tecumseh said...

We're gonna coddle our stomachs with boiled cod. Seethe.

12/03/2009 8:19 PM
Mr roT said...

A cod and a bounder.

12/03/2009 8:29 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...

" Not this weekend, but weekend after, right?"

Righto, Tecumseh.

Rott can hide behind his gilt bounded codpiece; but there'll be no coddling the cad on Judgement day.

12/03/2009 9:38 PM
Mr roT said...

AA, quit imagining me in those assless chaps and bronze codpiece! That was you in Pepe back in Chartres St days.

12/04/2009 7:48 AM
Tecumseh said...

It should also be noted that there are other accounts and other witnesses besides Phil "Fisticuffs" Murphy and his trusty right-hand Dr. Creighton "Tex" Slaughter.

Is he talking to me?

12/08/2009 1:09 PM
Tecumseh said...

If you'd bothered to click on the link, you woulda seen this codicil:

While the AJC story paints a much different picture of Flight 297, it doesn't answer all of the questions raised by the incident. For example, the paper (and other media outlets) confirm that a replacement crew was brought onboard to fly the plane to Houston, after the first crew declined the assignment.

That decision was made by the Captain originally assigned to the flight. It's rather unusual for a pilot-in-command to decline an assignment, and take his crew off the aircraft. Chaplain Keith Robinson of Houston, who was allowed to board the aircraft after it returned to the gate area. Based on his conversations with passengers and crews, Robinson believes that some sort of "intentional intimidation" occurred during the first departure attempt. And apparently, that intimidation attempt was so disconcerting that the original crew refused to complete their flight to Houston.

Hmmmm... So OK, the Tex guy embellished the story a bit. But there is no smoke without fire, Herr Rott. You shoulda have figured that one out by now.

12/08/2009 1:14 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)