Saturday, June 30, 2012

Yoo with you two.

Yoo-hoo!
Posted by at

11 comments:

Tecumseh said...

If a Republican is elected president, he will have to be more careful than the last. When he asks nominees the usual question about justices they agree with, the better answer should once again be Scalia or Thomas or Alito, not Roberts.

..or Souter.

6/30/2012 10:36 AM
Mr roT said...

Sandra Day O'Connor was a Reagan-appointee, no?

6/30/2012 2:58 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...

Sandra Day ain't a Supreme now...?

6/30/2012 4:12 PM
Mr roT said...

retired.

6/30/2012 4:34 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...

so ...........?

6/30/2012 4:53 PM
Tecumseh said...

Sandra Day was not perfect, but still, much better than Souter. Kind of like Kennedy, if you wish. I had high hopes for Roberts. I'm crushed by his betrayal. Cheer me up, guys -- willya?

6/30/2012 6:27 PM
Tecumseh said...

How's the wienerschnitzel? Sounds better and better to me.

7/01/2012 1:53 AM
Mr roT said...

Aren't you talking about legislatures and making sausage, Tecs? About Schnitzel, Bleh. Live here for a couple months and you'll see why Austrians go on food vacations to Zimbabwe.

Robts didn't betray anyone. He's got his view and it's coherent. I don't like his decision, but Romney did a lot worse by introducing socialized medicine to an insignificant corner of the USA.

Still pulling hard for Heretic Clark Kent, Tecs?

7/01/2012 4:03 AM
Tecumseh said...

No, Roberts' view is not coherent, and it's not based on the definitions he was working with. And that's that.

7/01/2012 6:50 AM
Mr roT said...

Ipse dixit.

7/01/2012 11:25 AM
Arelcao Akleos said...

Roberts dixit

7/01/2012 11:57 AM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)