Right there, at the start, the idiotpath author uses the word "horrific" for saddamites wearing panties. He too, it seems, has the Pepean outrage at worthy minions of Stalin Deux being so humiliated by those despicable Ricains. Imagine that, as punishment for participating in wholesale murder the misunderstood brethren of Lord PP were forced to dress up as a Le Pew at a San Fran cotillion. Yup, the Horror.
If you want to see real horror (as opposed to the make-believe Pepean pseudo-horror), take a look at one of those snuff movies, where the head-hackers hack the heads of the infidel. I saw one some weeks ago, and I could hardly sleep after that. I won't put a link, but you can google them easily.
Yes, AI, I saw the one of Nick Berg and some unlucky Polish guy who was taken while driving a truck. That's enough. Islam Militant sweeps the the Ummah and drowns neighboring Infidel lands, and Le Pew is deeply deeply concerned that his cotillion wear is being foisted on saddamistic thugs.
The worst I've seen was that of a Russian soldier in Chechnya having his neck puctured and then hacked. If Pepe thinks this is in the same league as having Lynddie England's undies wrapped around your head, well, all I can charitably say is that the hot, humid weather in Nawlins is getting to him. Perhaps a tiger's dick in sauce bechamel would cure this?
In case you missed it, the point was about rummy ratting out the rare soldier who did his duty which, regrettably for him, conflicted with the interests of the dod.
His duty was to report actions which are possibly illegal to his superiors. So there must be a law broken for which a violation can be reported. His report must cite the law, and how it was broken. If he reports to others than his superiors, then he is himself breaking the law, and this one actually is law, from the UCMJ. You have no respect for the law in the second place, only the first. You nod your nogging vigorously that panties on the head is a "horrific war crime", while your saddamistic heroes slaughtering magnificently the noncombatant and the helpless is an act of proper deneoconization of this world. You honor the man who gave impetus to the sycophants of saddam in the West. You disdain those who fight for the West. The beat goes on, Vichy. "Churchill Bad, Petain Good"
His duty was to report actions which are possibly illegal to his superiors. So there must be a law broken for which a violation can be reported. His report must cite the law, and how it was broken. Hmm. I guess he didn't fill the right form, then.
You honor the man who gave impetus to the sycophants of saddam in the West. You disdain those who fight for the West. Yes: it's the argument you've used repeatedly to excuse US soldiers actions: they rape & kill? Well, don't you remember Danny Pearl ? With this jingoistic rationalization, no matter what they do, the can't do wrong. Mel Brooks would say, it's good to be the king, and Lafontaine would concur: la raison du plus fort est toujours la meilleure.
The point, Vichy, is that it is very wrong to aid an absolutely barbaric enemy in order to correct the "Horror" of panties on barbarians' heads. It is close to treason, and it is definitely moral stupidity. If the guy thought there was a legitimate complaint, he had the Chain of Command to follow for his reports. To go to the Planet Pepeteers eagerly seeking a way to save their favorite living Stalinist was a crime far beyond embarassing Iraq's version of the SS. What he did was equivalent to some Petainist cheering on the German armies as they entered Paris on that Vichy glorious June 14th. Cheering because now that Monsieur Saul who you suspect sold you inferior wine at the local bistro [and who you caught, you swear, smirking behind your back] is going to get what's his, good and proper like. Embracing true evil to better fight against neocon pecadilloes, that's the Vichy Way alright.
11 comments:
Right there, at the start, the idiotpath author uses the word "horrific" for saddamites wearing panties. He too, it seems, has the Pepean outrage at worthy minions of Stalin Deux being so humiliated by those despicable Ricains.
Imagine that, as punishment for participating in wholesale murder the misunderstood brethren of Lord PP were forced to dress up as a Le Pew at a San Fran cotillion. Yup, the Horror.
If you want to see real horror (as opposed to the make-believe Pepean pseudo-horror), take a look at one of those snuff movies, where the head-hackers hack the heads of the infidel. I saw one some weeks ago, and I could hardly sleep after that. I won't put a link, but you can google them easily.
Yes, AI, I saw the one of Nick Berg and some unlucky Polish guy who was taken while driving a truck. That's enough.
Islam Militant sweeps the the Ummah and drowns neighboring Infidel lands, and Le Pew is deeply deeply concerned that his cotillion wear is being foisted on saddamistic thugs.
The worst I've seen was that of a Russian soldier in Chechnya having his neck puctured and then hacked. If Pepe thinks this is in the same league as having Lynddie England's undies wrapped around your head, well, all I can charitably say is that the hot, humid weather in Nawlins is getting to him. Perhaps a tiger's dick in sauce bechamel would cure this?
In case you missed it, the point was about rummy ratting out the rare soldier who did his duty which, regrettably for him, conflicted with the interests of the dod.
His duty was to agree with Pepe that wearing underwear is a "horrific" war crime? His duty was to be stupid beyond repair?
his duty was to report his peers illegal actions, obviously.
His duty was to report actions which are possibly illegal to his superiors. So there must be a law broken for which a violation can be reported. His report must cite the law, and how it was broken. If he reports to others than his superiors, then he is himself breaking the law, and this one actually is law, from the UCMJ.
You have no respect for the law in the second place, only the first. You nod your nogging vigorously that panties on the head is a "horrific war crime", while your saddamistic heroes slaughtering magnificently the noncombatant and the helpless is an act of proper deneoconization of this world.
You honor the man who gave impetus to the sycophants of saddam in the West. You disdain those who fight for the West.
The beat goes on, Vichy. "Churchill Bad, Petain Good"
His duty was to report actions which are possibly illegal to his superiors. So there must be a law broken for which a violation can be reported. His report must cite the law, and how it was broken.
Hmm. I guess he didn't fill the right form, then.
You honor the man who gave impetus to the sycophants of saddam in the West. You disdain those who fight for the West.
Yes: it's the argument you've used repeatedly to excuse US soldiers actions: they rape & kill? Well, don't you remember Danny Pearl ? With this jingoistic rationalization, no matter what they do, the can't do wrong. Mel Brooks would say, it's good to be the king, and Lafontaine would concur: la raison du plus fort est toujours la meilleure.
In other words, aa, is your point that, as long as you are less barbaric than your opponents, you are doing nothing wrong ?
The point, Vichy, is that it is very wrong to aid an absolutely barbaric enemy in order to correct the "Horror" of panties on barbarians' heads. It is close to treason, and it is definitely moral stupidity. If the guy thought there was a legitimate complaint, he had the Chain of Command to follow for his reports. To go to the Planet Pepeteers eagerly seeking a way to save their favorite living Stalinist was a crime far beyond embarassing Iraq's version of the SS.
What he did was equivalent to some Petainist cheering on the German armies as they entered Paris on that Vichy glorious June 14th. Cheering because now that Monsieur Saul who you suspect sold you inferior wine at the local bistro [and who you caught, you swear, smirking behind your back] is going to get what's his, good and proper like.
Embracing true evil to better fight against neocon pecadilloes, that's the Vichy Way alright.
Post a Comment