A. K. A. Loose Canon
The article states that we are "Demonizing supporters of traditional marriage", a patently false statement: it isn't like one is for gay marriage and against traditional marriage. There is no (non-bigotted) reason why the two can't coexist.Calling bigotry by its name isn't "playing the bigot card". Given that you and your camp have been unable to explain why you oppose gay marriage beyond statements of tradition, the bigot label is the most obvious explanation. If you find the characterization unfair, state why the nature of your gay neighbors' union should be any of your concern.ie: put out or shut up.
Tecs' neighbors' problems understanding basic biology and the function of having both sexes leads them to pair up and go to the hot tub they put in their yard.Tecs' kids point and laugh and, to mind, rightly so. Tecs is no bigot and when one of his colleagues announced to the department that he was on the other team than most people are on, Tecs didn't browbeat him at all. When that fac guy got in some trouble, I figured that he was in some kind of trouble for that. Tecs got mad at me instantly and informed me that he hadn't heard anyone say anything about that. I respected Tecs for being principled, but I think that's being principled to a fault. For an example of excess in that drection, see this.
Thanks, Mr Rot, for watching my back. Il faut le dire.
I am still impressed with your sticking to principle over gut feeling. Witnessing your strength though I did, I doubt that I would be so selfless.Thanks, Tecs. You're a good example.
Don't make me blush. I'd rather you kick me in the shins. Well, sort of.
Your qualifier is wise, Tecumseh. When Herr Rott goes to kick the shins he's inspired as if he played defensive mid for Italia.
Tecs not browbeating his colleague is evidence that the "DOM" crowd isn't motivated by bigotry. Check.What is the "basic biology" argument - are you saying that the inability to reproduce ought to be cause to not allow marriage ?
Tecs, about blushing, I have a cure: Blather on like a schoolgirl about Coanda some more and I will post some sex-store Romania cheerleader uniforms for you.Charly, about the basic biology comment, does the death toll from AIDS, brought over from outside by a airline steward who was a wrongholer, constitute a basic biology argument to keep sex between members of opposite sexes?Check it out. Vaginas don't usually tear when penetrated by the average penis if the girl is wet. Buttholes do, and the tear gives the blood, filth, and virus an avenue for entry.Q.E.D.
There is unquestionable wisdom in your observation that no sex means no VD. Regrettably, in this era of boundless promiscuity, the good'ol sodomy laws that kept many a sinner in check are out the window. Unless you don't think premarital sex happens, this is a little remote from the issue of marriage don't you think?
Yeah, Pepe. Clap and AIDS are the same.
Charly seems confused. Are you sure, Mr Rot, that you told him about the bees and the birds?
Damn! I thought that was Kayla's role.
Let's have a Committee on Un-Chicagoan Activities, aka CUCA, says Charly. Fits the lefty modus operandi to a T.
Man! The preachers in Chicago have balls and character. Furthermore, they are firm to their principles, which are coherent.The pinkos' creed begins and ends with "Don't hurt anyone's feelings or judge."That's hardly the creed of a people that has a chance in the long run.Pepe will reply,"Hooray for obscurantism!" as he clings a book on anthropogenic global warming.
Charly values in full regalia.
The pinkos' creed begins and ends with "Don't hurt anyone's feelings or judge."Huh? You gotta be kiddin' me, Mr Rot. That's just the conceited blarney pinkos put up as a facade, to either show off their purported moral superiority, or when confronted by Communism, or the Caliphate. But when dealing with a Joe Schmoe who doesn't toe the Party Line, the mask falls, and the brass knuckles come out.
When government demands loyalty to a political agenda rather than compliance with the law as a prerequisite for businesses to operate in their jurisdiction, that’s not freedom or a free market: it’s fascism, plain and simple, as well as extortion, which always goes hand in hand with fascism.Of course, Charly is totally cool with that.
Strange. After 9/11, some essayist claimed that the security balloon would turn the US into a dictatorship. Another one argued that the balllooning legalistic PC tendency would turn to a dictatorship.Drones aren't the first and Chick-Fil-A isn't the second, but both are increments that in their own ways lead to government intrusion increasing.
Charly, I am talking about outwardly. Yeah, I know that the unions and Democrats are in cahoots with organized crime and the mafia doesn't persuade or nudge.
Post a Comment