freecounterpoint: Coalition of the bailing

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Coalition of the bailing

9 comments:

Mr roT said...: I thought everyone would help us now that evil Bush is out. Wasn't that the point of electing the new sheriff?; 4/30/2009 8:27 AM
Pepe le Pew said...: no - everyone will help with the next war, provided it is legal: obama was elected partly on an agenda of ending this one, 'member ?; 4/30/2009 9:36 AM
Tecumseh said...: Mr Rot, Mr Rot -- you are trying to think logically, in a musty, Aristotelian/Cartesian way. This is so petty bourgeois. You gotta learn Newlogic -- the Pepean way to look at things. Get on with the program, willya?; 4/30/2009 9:38 AM
Tecumseh said...: As I was writing, Pepe came up with a new gem of his indescribable "logic". What, pray, makes the Iraq War "illegal"? Just repeating bullshitty pinko propaganda does not hack it, except in your make-believe world.; 4/30/2009 9:40 AM
Pepe le Pew said...: the war was never authorized by the UN security council.; 4/30/2009 9:45 AM
Mr roT said...: Yes, Tecs, I am still reeling from Pepe's answer.

I thought the pinkomania would abate if we got a dyed in the wool wooly in the WH, but he's getting worse.

Illegal wars. Interesting.; 4/30/2009 10:25 AM
Tecumseh said...: Pepe: last I checked, our Constitution is the Constitution (you know, the one allegedly shredded by W), not the UN Charter. And our C in C is rthe President, not the UN General Secretary. As a card-carrying pinko, though, I imagine these concepts are too hard to grasp for you.; 4/30/2009 11:27 AM
Pepe le Pew said...: yeah but the US signed the charter and, as a treaty, all members are bound by its articles. even americans.; 4/30/2009 11:57 AM
Mr roT said...: The Charter was stupid thing to sign, but even so, all the resolutions and (most importantly) Saddam's non-compliance with the cease-fire agreements rendered the Charter irrelevant.; 4/30/2009 4:00 PM

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)