freecounterpoint: Exists is equivalent to not exists

Sunday, February 28, 2010

REGURGE for another example of fuzzy thought.

Tecumseh said...: Right. This is a gift that keeps on giving. To sum up the link you put up:

x\in A \Longrightleftarrow x \notin A

How's that for Pepean logic at its best? I wouldn't call it fuzzy, though. It's very precise. More like, dog biting his own tail?; 2/28/2010 7:12 PM
Mr roT said...: How about this?; 2/28/2010 7:27 PM
Mr roT said...: You're right that the implication goes both ways, though this is not clear. In Pepean logic, it might not be permissible to swap A with ¬A.

So, Pelosi says a nonexistent bill exists that GOPers would be in on even if they unanimously voted against it, while not having an alternative that they have.

Alles klar, Woyzeck?; 2/28/2010 7:31 PM
Tecumseh said...: You're giving me a headache, Herr Rot! No way I can follow such a convoluted logic. You know what you gotta do if you want me to follow you: you got to draw a CD. In xypic.

In the meantime, here is an oh, duhh story.; 2/28/2010 7:36 PM
Mr roT said...: But we're beating the crap out of the Brits finally!; 2/28/2010 7:47 PM
Mr roT said...: Tecs trying to understand Pepean logique. Sad story.; 2/28/2010 8:05 PM