I'm talking about Rasmussen, who I thought was a rare man of integrity in a sorry euro-pinko environment. But, alas, it turns out he's willing to kiss the ass of those he stood up against at some point, in order to become NATO chief. The bigger question, then, is: what does it say about Rasmussen's capacity to lead NATO, when he's all too willing to abandon principles when they prove inconvenient?
As for Pepe, here he goes again with one of his fixations. Let me spell it out again for you, since you're too much caught up in your moronic little mind to get it: When someone spews imbecilities, I have no compunction in taking him to task -- of course, backed up by facts, and logical arguments, not by smirky, bullshitty non-sequiturs. Conversely, when someone makes a good argument, or comes up with a novel (even incisive) take on things, I equally well have no compunction in saying so, and praising him for that. And, if you don't like it, you can really kiss my ass. Capisci, Le Pew?
tec, you can dream you are james bond all you want but somewhere deep inside, you have to be aware that there is no relationship between the person "taking people to task -- of course, backed up by facts, and logical arguments," you are describing and the posts of tec/aa that anyone that reads this blog can discern. Matter of fact, what you consider "taking to task" consists almost exclusively in screaming "pinko bullshit", like some whacked out 16th century man of the cloth would scream "heresy" about anything that doesn't conform to religious dogma. And just like your butt-buddy aa, you find the merits of your own arguments so weak, you find it necessary to bolster them with ad hominems ad nauseam when you don't affect the offended tone of some virgin deflowered by a bunch of drunks. tec - you are a grown man, aren't you ? surely you must know yourself enough to not believe the nonsense in your last post.
6 comments:
Pepe has much to teach
With a name like Fagh Arsemuffin, he has a great capacity to learn.
I'm talking about Rasmussen, who I thought was a rare man of integrity in a sorry euro-pinko environment. But, alas, it turns out he's willing to kiss the ass of those he stood up against at some point, in order to become NATO chief. The bigger question, then, is: what does it say about Rasmussen's capacity to lead NATO, when he's all too willing to abandon principles when they prove inconvenient?
As for Pepe, here he goes again with one of his fixations. Let me spell it out again for you, since you're too much caught up in your moronic little mind to get it: When someone spews imbecilities, I have no compunction in taking him to task -- of course, backed up by facts, and logical arguments, not by smirky, bullshitty non-sequiturs. Conversely, when someone makes a good argument, or comes up with a novel (even incisive) take on things, I equally well have no compunction in saying so, and praising him for that. And, if you don't like it, you can really kiss my ass. Capisci, Le Pew?
tec, you can dream you are james bond all you want but somewhere deep inside, you have to be aware that there is no relationship between the person "taking people to task -- of course, backed up by facts, and logical arguments," you are describing and the posts of tec/aa that anyone that reads this blog can discern.
Matter of fact, what you consider "taking to task" consists almost exclusively in screaming "pinko bullshit", like some whacked out 16th century man of the cloth would scream "heresy" about anything that doesn't conform to religious dogma. And just like your butt-buddy aa, you find the merits of your own arguments so weak, you find it necessary to bolster them with ad hominems ad nauseam when you don't affect the offended tone of some virgin deflowered by a bunch of drunks.
tec - you are a grown man, aren't you ? surely you must know yourself enough to not believe the nonsense in your last post.
read tec/ai
Post a Comment