Saturday, March 27, 2010

Chicago school of economics

The case for repeal.
Posted by at
Labels:

5 comments:

Tecumseh said...

Indeed, many conservatives, for all their justified opposition to a government takeover of health care, have not yet quite seen the full extent to which this bill will exacerbate the cost problem. It is designed to push people into a system that will not exist—a health care bridge to nowhere—and so will cause premiums to rise and encourage significant dislocation and then will initiate a program of subsidies whose only real answer to the mounting costs of coverage will be to pay them with public dollars and so increase them further. It aims to spend a trillion dollars on subsidies to large insurance companies and the expansion of Medicaid, to micromanage the insurance industry in ways likely only to raise premiums further, to cut Medicare benefits without using the money to shore up the program or reduce the deficit, and to raise taxes on employment, investment, and medical research.

Palau or Pitcairn? That is the question.

3/27/2010 12:32 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...

Palau has the edge in quality of life. But even Palau has been "blessed" by the attentions of ChicagoSoc. Nobody cares about Pitcairn, not even da Evil Imperialistic Brits of Yore... something to be said for that

3/27/2010 1:09 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...

Chicago, 1984, AmeriSoc, Acorn, Rev. Wright, the CPUSA, Dohrn& Ayers,.
Gee, I was at the epicenter of it all, kick and counterkick with the bastards, and never had the foresight to get meself some reeducation, hook up on the groovy gravy govvy train, and now Rulz Overz Yusz.
Talk about not being als klahr on the concept.

3/27/2010 1:14 PM
Tecumseh said...

Life is full of missed opportunities. Some people figure out who is the strong horse, some don't.

3/27/2010 1:34 PM
Mr roT said...

They're like the hydra though...

3/27/2010 1:46 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)