What a surprise that when some wackos start slobbering about Article n, Section m, then other wackos echo and before long, the high boots get pulled on and the rope gets thrown over the branch.
Sounds to me like this is Tecs' fault big-time, since he started it all.
Monday, April 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
6 comments:
It's different. When I argue, it's based on facts, and the correct interpretation of the Constitution--like, say, Scalia would do. When a pinko libtard does it, it's all bs, on a Pepean rant level.
You gotta be able to pick up such subtle differences, Herr Rot.
I don't do nuance.
What about this guy, Tecs? Should he not have been mirandized before being euthanized?
I thought there was no Al Qaeda in Iraq -- it's one of those unshakable pinko mantras, no?
Video.
Ich habe nur langsam Elektronen!
Post a Comment