freecounterpoint: When Flatulence Can Be Lethal

Friday, September 15, 2006

When Flatulence Can Be Lethal

8 comments:

Arelcao Akleos said...: The man is a vicious thug. His ambitions for mass murder as an instrument of political change are matched only by a few outside of Islam. He deserves death, and, a rarity on this earth, one who truly deserves death unnatural shall actually receive it [unless Nippon suddenly chooses to misapply its sense of mercy]; 9/15/2006 9:51 PM
Tecumseh said...: It came as a surprise that Japan had the death penalty -- good to know that there is at least one more civilized country besides the US that recognizes that heinous crimes such as the ones commited by this creep deserve the hangman's noose (or a seat on old Sparky). The euro-pinko Left will undoubtedly sing the praises of the killer, and denounce the inhumanity of the punishment. Oh well, let them.; 9/15/2006 10:47 PM
The Darkroom said...: The euro-pinko Left will undoubtedly sing the praises of the killer

no

and denounce the inhumanity of the punishment

yes; 9/15/2006 10:57 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...: But Pepe knows that if the vicious thug was to undergo his last whiff in San Quentin, rather than Tokyo prefecture, he would have been made an honorary citizen of France by now.
He also knows that the bulk of the usual eurogaggle that pretends to care about "the inhumanity of the punishment", as long as it offers a chance to kick 'ricans in the shin, won't give a flyingf**k about this case.; 9/16/2006 10:00 AM
The Darkroom said...: But Pepe knows that if the vicious thug was to undergo his last whiff in San Quentin, rather than Tokyo prefecture, he would have been made an honorary citizen of France by now.
Can you back that up ?

He also knows that the bulk of the usual eurogaggle that pretends to care about "the inhumanity of the punishment", as long as it offers a chance to kick 'ricans in the shin, won't give a flying f**k about this case.
Well, yeah. The important thing here is the death penalty itself. What happens to this particular shithead is unfortunate but I don't know anyone that'll cry over him. I think you are mixing opposition to the death penalty with supporting criminality. Just like you are confusing opposition to the iraq war with support for saddam, osama, hitler, pol pot and staline.; 9/16/2006 10:07 AM
Tecumseh said...: No, there's no confusion here. The connections are crystal clear. As a concrete example, take Mumia Abu-Jamal, a convicted cop killer from Philadelphia, who became a cause celebre for the world-wide Left, and was made a honorary Parisian by the French. Isn't this a glaring (and official) example of "supporting criminality"?

As for opposition to Iraq vs support for Saddam, etc, well, OK, it's not a perfect correlation (nothing in real life is), but it's a highly positive correlation. For, those making the case that we should cut and run from Iraq, ipso facto must deprecate the evilness of Saddam, his ties to AQ, and the danger he posed to America (and the West), in order to make their siren song case for defeat and abject surrender, a case they've (or theit precursors) have been making, in one shape or the other, ever since the start of the Cold War.; 9/16/2006 11:25 AM
Mr roT said...: You know, AI, you are gonna get a ton of shit for repeating the claim that AQ and Saddam were in bed together.
Do you have that Hitchens article around where he claims to have proven this link?; 9/16/2006 12:06 PM
The Darkroom said...: Check this out ai.; 9/16/2006 2:29 PM

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)