...willing to extend a diplomatic hand to Tehran if the Islamic republic is ready to "unclench its fist". Why, that's not necessary. Pepe likes it clenched.
Mozambique won its independence from Portugese tyranny in the 1970s if I am not mistaken - you would do much better by looking in your own confused sow-buggering psyche before calling anyone anything.
Uh, Moron. For that is what you are. You protest you are not steeped in ignorance? Fine, that leaves Stupidity for your failure to have anything more than a measure zero intersection set with Reality. Two points: First, the reference, and your reference, was to "domination" in the world. Not "colonialism". Unless you are willing to grossly redefine what is meant by "domination" it takes quite the idiot for the Portuguese colonies in Angola and Mocambique [heck, throw in Goa, Timor Este, and Macao] to be construed as "domination". By those standards France still dominates the world [or does that explain you better than you realized it would?]. Second, Mocambique did not "win independence". There was no successful guerilla war forcing out the Portuguese from that territory. You are such a moron that you take the French in Algiers and Vietnam as the template for how European colonialism ends. [the closest that came to that was Guinea-Bissau. But without googling you probably would guess that to be a beer out of Martinique]. The "Ultramar" came to an end when General Espinola overthrew the National People's Party and set out a path to democracy, including the granting of independence to all territories in Africa. Mocambique no more "won" independence from Portugal than India or Canada or Burma did from England. You are mistaken. But at least you are consistently mistaken, and Hobbes had it nailed down the kind of mind you have.
Pepe, stop diggin'. Just accept the fact that you don't know scat what the hell you're talking about. You'll feel better after that. All this attempts at bullshitting are straining your neurons. You need some rest. Single malt may do you good.
12 comments:
America's policy of "domination" has failed
Just like the French, Spanish, Portuguese and the British in XIX-XX c - it's called progress and it's all good.
...willing to extend a diplomatic hand to Tehran if the Islamic republic is ready to "unclench its fist". Why, that's not necessary. Pepe likes it clenched.
Mozambique won its independence from Portugese tyranny in the 1970s if I am not mistaken - you would do much better by looking in your own confused sow-buggering psyche before calling anyone anything.
Uh, Moron. For that is what you are. You protest you are not steeped in ignorance? Fine, that leaves Stupidity for your failure to have anything more than a measure zero intersection set with Reality.
Two points:
First, the reference, and your reference, was to "domination" in the world. Not "colonialism". Unless you are willing to grossly redefine what is meant by "domination" it takes quite the idiot for the Portuguese colonies in Angola and Mocambique [heck, throw in Goa, Timor Este, and Macao] to be construed as "domination". By those standards France still dominates the world [or does that explain you better than you realized it would?].
Second, Mocambique did not "win independence". There was no successful guerilla war forcing out the Portuguese from that territory. You are such a moron that you take the French in Algiers and Vietnam as the template for how European colonialism ends. [the closest that came to that was Guinea-Bissau. But without googling you probably would guess that to be a beer out of Martinique].
The "Ultramar" came to an end when General Espinola overthrew the National People's Party and set out a path to democracy, including the granting of independence to all territories in Africa. Mocambique no more "won" independence from Portugal than India or Canada or Burma did from England.
You are mistaken. But at least you are consistently mistaken, and Hobbes had it nailed down the kind of mind you have.
Enough of Pepe's intentions to hijack this post for another monument to hid idiocy.
Back to Obama and Madjad's reading of that Dhimmi Fey.
The reference, and your reference, was to "domination" in the world. Not "colonialism".
Right - one is a means to the other.
Second, Mocambique did not "win independence". There was no successful guerilla war forcing out the Portuguese from that territory.
Excuse me ???
Pepe, stop diggin'. Just accept the fact that you don't know scat what the hell you're talking about. You'll feel better after that. All this attempts at bullshitting are straining your neurons. You need some rest. Single malt may do you good.
The Portuguese did a great job of civilizing Uganda. Leave them alone.
That's Angola, no? OK, 6 = 12/2.
yeah angola - nice job there.
"Excuse me ???"
Can't you read? Guess not.
You are excused.
Enough of Pepe's intentions to hijack this post for another monument to hid idiocy.
Back to Obama and Madjad's reading of that Dhimmi Fey.
Since Le Pew can't read, can someone in Tejas shout real loud like over Nawlins way?
Post a Comment