Monday, March 30, 2009

Lighten Up, Francis: An Allegiance PP can Pledge to

For Le Pew's Edification: more AmeriSoc, The Early Years
Posted by at
Labels: , , , ,

10 comments:

Pepe le Pew said...

An Allegiance PP can Pledge to

Since he's not more of a socialist than a christian ? what are you blabbering again this time, gerboy ?

3/30/2009 6:26 AM
Pepe le Pew said...

The economy is larger than the healthcare sector, ai.

3/30/2009 10:11 AM
Tecumseh said...

Yes. But it's a slippery slope. Once you accept (and actively promote) the basic Socialist idea that teh all-powerful and omniscient State should run the health system, and the education system (and myriad other nooks and crannies of our daily lives), it's a slippery slope -- actually, a tiny stretch -- to accept the premise that the State should run everything. In other words, a command economy, replete with Five Year Plans, and an all-powerful bureaucracy, and of course a nomenklatura that reaps the rewards of the system (any system has its winners and losers, even a command economy has its silver lining for the chosen few). In other words, pinko hog heaven.

3/30/2009 11:12 AM
Pepe le Pew said...

Yes. But it's a slippery slope.
Only for ideologues.

3/30/2009 12:18 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...

Pathetic Pepe, trying to make what's distinctive about Bellamy his being of Christian background rather than his Socialist Testamento. Bet Le Pew didn't even bother to read up on Francis, or his brother Edward. Beyond saying "Jesus was a Socialist" can you see anything but Socialism in his oeuvre
Since Le Pew is literally challenged[in every sense] perhaps he should be reminded that if had but read the damn thing he would have seen that the "under God" part didn't get added on until the 1950s, longer after brother Francis had joined that grand Material Dialectic in the sky.

Pepe is a Socialist, and an anti-democrat. You know he would have been all sympathetic with King Georgie had he been a Brit, and a gung ho pamphleteer for Jefferson Davisionian, [who was nuanced, and sophisticated, unlike that christer rube Lincoln]. Which makes of him a perfect Democrat.
As for his concern or understanding of economics, it extends only to this "As an Aristo, peasants, Ubi Mea?!"

3/30/2009 3:23 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
3/30/2009 3:30 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...

Arelcao Akleos said...
Oh, in case Le Pew goes into one of his ravings wherein 2+2 is once again set out as 5, let him be reminded that he has a track record, on FCP, of consistently choosing sides with, and claiming admiration for, the Socialist alternative[and if he couldn't find it, the nearest anti-American alternative]. From Hussein to Castro to Obama, it has been an unwavering red line-- with the occasional green tinge.
Now he is conflicted. The USA is becoming Red, yet Le Pew is now long habituated to reflexive anti-Ricainism.
After decadespining for the likes of Obama,and now richlygetting it in fulsome spades up his whazoo, he is adrift in his confusion. Is that all there is, for the Aristo boy? Is the merde he insisted on shitting on this country so truly foul tasting?
Yup,Pepe, now eat that Tough Shit.

As for the Pledge, it is exactly the Soc crud you ran interference for; now revel in your day.

3/30/2009 3:34 PM
Pepe le Pew said...

Bet Le Pew didn't even bother to read up on Francis, or his brother Edward.

You're absolutely right. And more generally, I don't bother to read much of what you write, let alone look up the references.

3/30/2009 4:04 PM
Tecumseh said...

That's lame, Pepe, very lame.

3/30/2009 4:38 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...

Par for the course, with Pepe. Easier for him to not know than to have his lying dogmas troubled.

But why he bothers responding, pretending to have read the pieces, and relying on us to call his bluff [which is pathetic in every direction] is the question.

3/30/2009 5:12 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)