If true, The New York Times is showing once again that it is a not an impartial observer of the political scene. If they want to be a mouthpiece for the Democratic Party, they should put Barack Obama approves of this in their newspaper.
Duhhh. All knuckle-draggers knew that, in their bones.
The New York Times keeps going over the line in every single campaign and last year was the worst, easily. They would ignore real questions worth examining about Obama, the questions about Bill Ayers or about how he got his house. Then on the other side they would try to manufacture scandals.
Par for the course for a pinko newspaper.
The New York Times is a liberal newspaper. It is dedicated to furthering the Democratic Party. People think The New York Times is an objective news source and it is not. It would not surprise me that if they had a news story that would have swayed the election into McCain’s favor they would not have used it.
Well, duhhh. What do you expect from Pravda on the Hudson? Objectivity? Hah!
It was "The Grey Old Lady Helps Out Pepe", and it was the exact same article. Fuck it, you owe me two one way tickets. First one from Boston to Bangkok, and then one for two weeks later, Bangkok to Palau.
Rot is a slippery sort: he'll do and say anything to slip out of a jam, including going full hog Pepe on you. So keep his feet to the fire, and don't let Rot slip out, Houdini-like.
BTW, why the two-week stopover in Bangkok? Never been to the place. Worth a detour?
Here is a link to AA's overlooked posting, saved from the Memory Hole. BTW, I added a list of labels on the right side of the blog, in descending frequency order. To find AA's posting, I simply clicked on the "Gray Old Lady" button. Voilà!
8 comments:
If true, The New York Times is showing once again that it is a not an impartial observer of the political scene. If they want to be a mouthpiece for the Democratic Party, they should put Barack Obama approves of this in their newspaper.
Duhhh. All knuckle-draggers knew that, in their bones.
The New York Times keeps going over the line in every single campaign and last year was the worst, easily. They would ignore real questions worth examining about Obama, the questions about Bill Ayers or about how he got his house. Then on the other side they would try to manufacture scandals.
Par for the course for a pinko newspaper.
The New York Times is a liberal newspaper. It is dedicated to furthering the Democratic Party. People think The New York Times is an objective news source and it is not. It would not surprise me that if they had a news story that would have swayed the election into McCain’s favor they would not have used it.
Well, duhhh. What do you expect from Pravda on the Hudson? Objectivity? Hah!
Uh, Rot, You Arse, Maven of...I already posted on this a few days ago. Fuck VCP, you owe me a one way ticket to Palau.
It was "The Grey Old Lady Helps Out Pepe", and it was the exact same article.
Fuck it, you owe me two one way tickets. First one from Boston to Bangkok, and then one for two weeks later, Bangkok to Palau.
Sorry AA. It lacks a certain legitimacy when you post conspiracy articles.
Remember the Debka debacles, Debakles?
Huh? I posted the same article you did. Well before you did. Pay up or squeal like a pig. Don't go all Pepean on us now, Rot.
OK, but a mini. Still, the Debka days are a reminder cum grano salis...
Rot is a slippery sort: he'll do and say anything to slip out of a jam, including going full hog Pepe on you. So keep his feet to the fire, and don't let Rot slip out, Houdini-like.
BTW, why the two-week stopover in Bangkok? Never been to the place. Worth a detour?
Here is a link to AA's overlooked posting, saved from the Memory Hole. BTW, I added a list of labels on the right side of the blog, in descending frequency order. To find AA's posting, I simply clicked on the "Gray Old Lady" button. Voilà!
Post a Comment