Is this the paper where he showed the "Keyfitz Uncertainty Principle"?? Remember, the one where the closer you are to being fixed on the married state the further you are from surely gittin' some, and the closer you are to surely gittin' some the further you are from being fixed on the married state?
From the review: He studies the system of equations $M_t{}'=-µ_MM_t+\lambda_MG(F_t,M_t)$, $F_t{}'=-µ_FF_t+\lambda_FG(F_t,M_t)$ when $G=2M_t{}^{1-\varepsilon}F_t{}^{1-\varepsilon}/(M_t+F_t)$ and $\varepsilon$ measures the degree of female dominance $(-1\leq\varepsilon\leq 1)$. A simple age-independent model involving a force of marriage and birth within marriage, only, is discussed. Hmmm....
9 comments:
Is this the paper where he showed the "Keyfitz Uncertainty Principle"??
Remember, the one where the closer you are to being fixed on the married state the further you are from surely gittin' some, and the closer you are to surely gittin' some the further you are from being fixed on the married state?
AA! You're alive. Happy New Year!
Btw, the article is very simple. Its content is just a logical "not".
Happy New Year, JJ!
I am [and no thanks to American Airlines here] technically yet alive.
Looking forward to a year with a nonzero probability of not being worse than last year.
Glad to see you survived AA flights, AA. You alive and kickin', or just alive?
From the review: He studies the system of equations $M_t{}'=-µ_MM_t+\lambda_MG(F_t,M_t)$, $F_t{}'=-µ_FF_t+\lambda_FG(F_t,M_t)$ when $G=2M_t{}^{1-\varepsilon}F_t{}^{1-\varepsilon}/(M_t+F_t)$ and $\varepsilon$ measures the degree of female dominance $(-1\leq\varepsilon\leq 1)$. A simple age-independent model involving a force of marriage and birth within marriage, only, is discussed. Hmmm....
Just alive, AI. Kickin' can wait until tomorrow.
Remember this song?
Ahhh.... blast from the past.
Post a Comment