Yeah, we know our Karl Marx. So do the Obamakleans. As for Le Pew, he's still trying to decide if he should hash his hemp or gash his shemp.
Monday, March 02, 2009
Gee, Guy, You Should Have Read FCP 6 Months Ago
Yeah, we know our Karl Marx. So do the Obamakleans. As for Le Pew, he's still trying to decide if he should hash his hemp or gash his shemp.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
18 comments:
Universal food? Should the government provide food for every person? In the Fox Poll, 68% say yes. Healthcare? 66% say yes. Housing? 52% say yes. A job, 51% say yes.
I need free snow shoveling, NOW!! Also, free lawn care later. Pepe, why don't see to that? While at it, I think the Pinko Nanny State should also provide free access to photographic stuff -- no need for bourgeois bloodsucking faux-pink aristos, let the proles help themselves. Right, Pepe?
Don't know about snow, but aa surely won't mind sharing a gerbil or two with you.
Bobbing and weaving to avoid the issue, are we, Pepe? Question at hand is: Is Marxism the wave of the future for the U. S. of A.? You've done all you could to push through the pinko ideology -- are you prepared to reap what you have sown?
Of course he isn't. Facing the consequences of the Versaillean idiocy is the last thing an Aristo wants. The point is to make the peasants suffer and to carve an island of unbounded luxury for those attached to the Court/Inner Party.
What, you think there's a critter who gives a damn about the rights of men on that there Planet Pepe?
Of course not. But you have to give it to the old-fashioned aristos: they were in-you-face smug about their privileges, and about their contempt for the stinking peasants. What raises my hackles more than anything else about the modern version of the lefty-aristo is the cosmic chutzpah of their conceit. The pudgy, fat, self-satisfied mug of Teddy K comes to mind when thinking of the archetypal limo-liberal type, who rants and raves about how he defends the little people when of course he's laughing all the way to the bank (or off the bridge). Faute de mieux, Pepe is our poor man's Teddy around here.
Now that is an image even more telling, and horrible, than all the kayla and gerbil mongering in the world.
Hmmmmmm "Pepe Le Teddy" or "Teddy Le Pew".....
Very nice, Tecumseh.
Is Marxism the wave of the future for the U. S. of A.
Hopefully not, but it is difficult to not smile at the notion that marx in its lite form is called upon to rescue of reagan in its full flavor form. If this works, will you people question your stances or will you never let practical considerations interfere with ideology ?
You've done all you could to push through the pinko ideology
Like what, tec ? While I will give you that I am as pinko as they come on most if not all social issues, most of the people around me would think I am a rwn on economics, save for healthcare.
The point is to make the peasants suffer
Well, it is so much fun to watch them twitch in agony.
how he defends the little people when of course he's laughing all the way to the bank.
The only people really laughing all the way to the bank are the Wall Street corporate execs, tec. They are not known to be "pinkos", They are your people. Taking directly from the rubes' pockets the air to inflate their golden parachutes and bonuses.
You should either substantiate the statement that I take from these people to laugh all the way to the bank, or shut the fuck up.
Arelcao Akleos said...
PPspews: "Hopefully not, but it is difficult to not smile at the notion that marx in its lite form is called upon to rescue of reagan in its full flavor form. "
The initial lie is immediately supplanted by the smile that betrays it. Natch.
The destruction of this country through Socialism, building on Bush's tendency ["Compassionate Conservatism in that direction in his last term], is "a rescue of reagan"? That is beyond lying. It is pure stupidity. BushII is to Reagan as Boris Johnson is to Thatcher [or, to put it in terms even you can grasp, Charles Fourier was to Voltaire]. And Obama is to Bush II as Lenin was to Kerensky.
There is nothing "lite" about Socialism. Whether Marxist or Nationalist any attempt at 'democratic socialism" either quickly forgets to take seriously the socialism, or the democracy chokes and dies. Although, give your disdain for democracy, it is a "lite" matter to you.
As for the "if this works" riff, Pepe Le Leech, it is like asking if the bloodletting and filling the room with smoke cures the cancer will we embrace the pragmatic virtues of quackery and forego our ideological adherence to studying the world scientifically and having an empirical basis to making claims on it.
PPspew: "Like what, tec ? While I will give you that I am as pinko as they come on most if not all social issues, most of the people around me would think I am a rwn on economics, save for healthcare"
So, says Pepe, "just because I'm a Pinko on absolutely everything except for the odd economic bit which my fellow cocktail chatterers have picked up on, doesn't mean I'm a pinko"
Huh uh. Le Pew, excepting for utterly fatuous monsters, such as Jong IL, the brute horribleness of Socialist economics being able to do anything but immiserate the masses unto the end of the world was too obvious for even some leading pinkos to deny. So they moved to the fascist arrangement of allowing some vestigial traces of private enterprise and the market: in order to provide ballast to a ship that would otherwise sink.
You and the CPC , and even the CPUSAm have the same Party Platform; a kind of frozen NEP policy. It's not a problem for the komrads in Beijing, and they never lose sight of State Control as being what Pinko is all about. Neither do you. After all, what's the point of having Absolute Power if there isn't enough wealth for the peasants to sew your shirts of silk?
PPspew: "The point is to make the peasants suffer
Well, it is so much fun to watch them twitch in agony"
Of course. As you said, time to Smile.
"The only people really laughing all the way to the bank are the Wall Street corporate execs, tec. They are not known to be "pinkos", They are your people. Taking directly from the rubes' pockets the air to inflate their golden parachutes and bonuses.
You should either substantiate the statement that I take from these people to laugh all the way to the bank, or shut the fuck up"
Thank you for substantiating MFTs point [with the cartoon] at the end. If one can't reason, nor bother to say anything true, then just order folks to "shut the fuck up". Of course, cretin, I really would like you see try to make Tecumseh "shut the fuck up". You know, put your body on the line, test that famously virgin courage of yours.
As for what passes for your "point", the last thing I see is people in banking smiling, whether they are going to the bank or not. I see crooks, like Madoff, smiling. No banker he, nor investor. Pure 100% conman. Protected by his many close buddies in government and the Democrat Party. Still so influential that the judges keep letting him drink champagne at home indefinitely [gotta wonder what their relationship with him is], and he laughs merrily to court or to reporters all over the streets of New York. Less ambitiuos crooks, at more limited levels of thievery, of course are not smiling, because they are actually getting arrested and put in jail. But that ain't PP's Madoff or Soros [yes, Soros' record of "uncanny precision"--in his case in international funds-- matches Madoff. Be Proud].
Real bankers, those who run legitimate banks and not ponzi schemes or money laundering rackets, are of two kinds. The many which are smaller, and which are getting almost no help at all, or the few which are powerful, are connected to the politicos, and are getting the vast chunks of ObamaGold [Citicorp, AIG, BankofAmerica, for example]. The latter are smiling, the former not at all. But then the latter are buttbuddies with the State, and get "special" treatment. After all, what is the point of AmeriSoc if all those corporate contributions to the Dems Widow&Orphans Fund were to buy you nothing at all? You think Da Chicago Machine doesn't know how to run a One Party State?
No, I won't tell you to "shut the fuck up". That thugs' way is all yours, and so very expected from a pinko pig. But, c'mon, Berkeley Sheepmonger, try to make an argument, with clear premisses, empirically verifiable evidence, at least an honest attempt at logic. You know, try some of that fabled Reason that brought the human race out of the collectivist dung you wish to return us all to.
your pills, aa! you're foaming again. relax, insert another gerbil.
try to make an argument, with clear premisses, empirically verifiable evidence, at least an honest attempt at logic. You know, try some of that fabled Reason that brought the human race out of the collectivist dung you wish to return us all to.
You have no interest in logic aa. If I say white, you will say black, just like the little (inverted) sheep you are. None of your angry rants so far have been worthy of the effort of an argument, but act like you have some interest in a fair argument and I'll give it a shot. How's that ?
Oh, I have great interest in a fair argument. For 3 years we have been waiting for one from you. Get the muezzin to call the faithful to the Mosque of Notre Dame when you find one.
Oh, 'fair" as in be prepared to argue and to back up what you say with, again, Reason. Being a socialist thug you take 'fair' as meaning "my opponent can be hit with a thoughtcrime charge if I don't like what he's saying. I can make him shut up".
You have told lots of us, many times, to "shut up". You have never ever presented arguments.
Fair away, chump.
Post a Comment