Tuesday, October 24, 2006

False premises?

But British universities prefer burying their heads in the sand of political correctness. When the Foreign Office invited 100 academics to bid for £1.3 million of government funds to participate in a counter-radicalization program, the academics said no. John Gledhill, chair of the Association of Social Anthropologists, welcomed their move, saying last week that "it did appear to be encouraging researchers to identify subjects and groups involved with terrorism . . . that could be interpreted as encouraging them to become informers." Martha Mundy, a lecturer at the London School of Economics, dismissed the government plans as having "an overtly security-research agenda" starting from the (false) premise that there is a "link between Islamism, radicalization and terrorism."

Oh, yeah?

2 comments:

Mr roT said...

The false premise was that these 'researchers' would have been of any use even assuming they would be willing to help.

Arelcao Akleos said...

What, you doubt the eagle eyed sharpness of the OverSeers of Academe?