I admit that first time through I didn't get wtf was going on here. Frankly the rightwingnews.com url threw me off as much as the corriere.it url turns you guys off. So am I to understand that there's a Senate candidate that's sharing his paedo-homo jerk dreams with the whole world like Foley but trying to get elected, not deciding to go into his study with a whiskey and a loaded revolver???
JJ: I changed the subject since what else was gthere to talk about in this post -- bunda dreams? Sorry for the cognitive dissonance -- it was a stretch, even by our loose standards in this blog.
I don't know much about Webb nowadays, but I still remember him from the good old days -- the early 80's. He was involved with building the 600 ship navy for Ronnie, to beat back the Evil Empire, and he was quite good at that. I assume he did something non-trivial in Vietnam, and comported himself with dignity upon his return (unlike Jean Francois). But now he's had a change of heart (oh, well, happens to the best), and switched parties. Fine, let him run. But what's good for the goose is good for the gander, no? No, since of course, once one pledges allegiance to the left-lib set, one becomes immunized to any and all (well, almost all) critique from the MSM, yes? Oh, the beauty of it all. The only wonder is that not many more people (especially, more politicians) succumb to this siren song of having the MSM lock stock and barrel on your side, no matter what, once you get on their good graces.
I would run as a Democrat if it gave me a better chance at the largess and the bundesse. Say you're from California and you're a newbie in politics. Sure, you toe the line while you make your name for yourself and then try to pull to the right. Clinton did that all the way to the White House. You think he had a chance as a Repub in Arkansas? Dump the black vote there and you can forget it. You think the Kennedys and Feingolds were with him on reforming welfare? That he was worthless on defense was because of his shallowness, not his lefty inclination, I don't think.
5 comments:
Relevant? Let's see if Pepe will shed any crocodile tears over this story.
I admit that first time through I didn't get wtf was going on here. Frankly the rightwingnews.com url threw me off as much as the corriere.it url turns you guys off.
So am I to understand that there's a Senate candidate that's sharing his paedo-homo jerk dreams with the whole world like Foley but trying to get elected, not deciding to go into his study with a whiskey and a loaded revolver???
He seems a badass to me. link
JJ: I changed the subject since what else was gthere to talk about in this post -- bunda dreams? Sorry for the cognitive dissonance -- it was a stretch, even by our loose standards in this blog.
I don't know much about Webb nowadays, but I still remember him from the good old days -- the early 80's. He was involved with building the 600 ship navy for Ronnie, to beat back the Evil Empire, and he was quite good at that. I assume he did something non-trivial in Vietnam, and comported himself with dignity upon his return (unlike Jean Francois). But now he's had a change of heart (oh, well, happens to the best), and switched parties. Fine, let him run. But what's good for the goose is good for the gander, no? No, since of course, once one pledges allegiance to the left-lib set, one becomes immunized to any and all (well, almost all) critique from the MSM, yes? Oh, the beauty of it all. The only wonder is that not many more people (especially, more politicians) succumb to this siren song of having the MSM lock stock and barrel on your side, no matter what, once you get on their good graces.
I would run as a Democrat if it gave me a better chance at the largess and the bundesse.
Say you're from California and you're a newbie in politics. Sure, you toe the line while you make your name for yourself and then try to pull to the right.
Clinton did that all the way to the White House. You think he had a chance as a Repub in Arkansas?
Dump the black vote there and you can forget it.
You think the Kennedys and Feingolds were with him on reforming welfare?
That he was worthless on defense was because of his shallowness, not his lefty inclination, I don't think.
Post a Comment