Saturday, February 06, 2010

OK Tecs, you called it right on the NYC KSM trial

Now, is Hölder going subvehicular?
Posted by at
Labels:

3 comments:

Mr roT said...

Obama has it all under control.

2/06/2010 12:44 PM
Tecumseh said...

At the White House, Emanuel, who is not a lawyer, opposed Holder’s position on the 9/11 cases. He argued that the Administration needed the support of key Republicans to help close Guantánamo, and that a fight over Khalid Sheikh Mohammed could alienate them. “There was a lot of drama,” the informed source said. . . . “Rahm felt very, very strongly that it was a mistake to prosecute the 9/11 people in the federal courts, and that it was picking an unnecessary fight with the military-commission people,” the informed source said. “Rahm had a good relationship with [Sen. Lindsay] Graham, and believed Graham when he said that if you don’t prosecute these people in military commissions I won’t support the closing of Guantánamo. . . . Rahm said, ‘If we don’t have Graham, we can’t close Guantánamo, and it’s on Eric!’ ”

Did Rhambo use the "effing retards" line in this context, too? Good find, Herr Rot. Looks like things are heating up.

By the way, we haven't used the "This is not the xxx I knew label" in a long while. Time to dust it up, one of these days?

2/06/2010 4:32 PM
Tecumseh said...

Which brings us to Barack Obama’s “war on terror.” Conservatives keep saying that Obama doesn’t really believe we’re at war; that he sees terrorists as mere criminals, not the epic evil-doers that they really are. But here’s the irony: It’s precisely because he doesn’t see the terrorist threat as quite so epic that al Qaeda is falling apart.

Right. With Pepe at the wheel, all is peaches and cream. Not a worry.

2/06/2010 5:03 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)