Sunday, October 22, 2006
Beeb Bites Beeb
The full account of the meeting shows how senior BBC figures queued up to lambast their employer. Political pundit Andrew Marr said: 'The BBC is not impartial or neutral. It's a publicly funded, urban organisation with an abnormally large number of young people, ethnic minorities and gay people. It has a liberal bias not so much a party-political bias. It is better expressed as a cultural liberal bias.' Washington correspondent Justin Webb said that the BBC is so biased against America that deputy director general Mark Byford had secretly agreed to help him to 'correct', it in his reports. Webb added that the BBC treated America with scorn and derision and gave it 'no moral weight'. Former BBC business editor Jeff Randall said he complained to a 'very senior news executive', about the BBC's pro-multicultural stance but was given the reply: 'The BBC is not neutral in multiculturalism: it believes in it and it promotes it.' Randall also told how he once wore Union Jack cufflinks to work but was rebuked with: 'You can't do that, that's like the National Front!' Quoting a George Orwell observation, Randall said that the BBC was full of intellectuals who 'would rather steal from a poor box than stand to attention during God Save The King'.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Dog bites man story, JJ. Next thing you'll tell us is that the sky is blue.
But yes, well put, and still, aftre all these years, it grates to hear the extent to which the MSM hates the West. It's on a par with those Cambridge-Oxford dons of the 30's (Philby, Burgess, MacMillan, etc) who decided to switch sides to Stalin.
Now it's time for CBS, NBC, ABC, NPR to admit the same.
Too slick for that. Better to hem and haw and hedge. But the difference between them and BBC (or le Monde, for that matter) is infinitesimal.
I agree that NPR is about BBC but I think the big 4 are a little bit more reasonable and le Monde a little further out there.
Pepe says that from his point of view it's getting too far out but he seems to read the nyt.
Looking around for NPR types saying similar things, I found some extreme hilarity here and here. These guys think NPR has moved RIGHT!
JJ, have you considered that maybe he is telling the truth? Maybe the leadership now is slightly more "right", only this time they are truly open about their views. In which case we should reflect on just where they stood at that place they "Left" behind.
Had the Soviet Union won the struggle, it would be fascinating to see just how strong the fifth column was throughout the upper echelons of our media and politics.
Actrually, some of those people were on the payola -- not just useful idiots for the USSR, but making a honest ruble out of it. Wonder whether any of these guys still making a buck at pissing on Uncle Sam. Not that it really matters -- most will do it just for the sport of it, but some have bills to pay...
You been listening to NPR, AA?
In Seattle, yes. Up in Canuckistan there is the CBC version of things. Imagine the NPR being given BBC clout and Harvard license with dissent. Or, more pithily, NPR broadcasting to the UN.
That used to pith me off when I lived up there in Blandberia.
Post a Comment