freecounterpoint: Prince Harry's faux pas

Monday, January 12, 2009

Prince Harry's faux pas

Now, now, now -- does he look a bit, shall we say, frutti-tutti?

7 comments:

Arelcao Akleos said...: Fat Ronaldo and Twitter Totti could not be more fruti-tutti.; 1/12/2009 12:35 AM
AI said...: "Harry isn't particularly bright," Ingrid Seward, editor-in-chief of Majesty Magazine, said. "He's probably unable to figure out what he can do and what he can do and what he can say and can't say."

Aw, his mother was not too bright, either--I never understood the British adulation for that nicompoop. And his father -- well, let's skip that. At any rate, why is there so much attention devoted to this guy? If he weren't a prince, would anyone care?; 1/12/2009 12:40 AM
Arelcao Akleos said...: No, AI, no one would care. But I kinda feel sorry for him. Between his idiot mama and gerbil papa he had very small chance in the genetic lottery; 1/12/2009 12:42 AM
My Frontier Thesis said...: Generations of Noble Inbreeding has truly been Royal.; 1/12/2009 9:17 PM
Pepe le Pew said...: I never understood the British adulation for that nicompoop.

She was pretty hot and not an extract of that degenerate inbred british upper class. Didn want a physics nobel price to help Chuck keep it up? Look at what he's got now!; 1/13/2009 3:46 PM
JJ said...: I think Harry is being very bright here, acting like a fags. This way the arsebishoprick of Cockerbury will back him up in whatever he does.; 1/13/2009 10:59 PM
Arelcao Akleos said...: Actually, Le Pew, Diana was was a product of that degenerate inbred upper class. A Bleu Aristo up to a minimum of 0.5.
You just had the hots for the dumb broad.; 1/14/2009 4:09 AM

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)