Sunday, April 30, 2006

In Praise of the Pew, the Proud, y El Caudillos

In Latin America, as much elsewhere, there were/are Fascists, Communists, and there were/are "Strongmen". The first two functioned, or pretended to function, on an ideology of The State, and both claimed to be socialist movements "of the People". [Strongmen were more frankly "Ubi Mea", and in that sense they were a more honest form of gangster ].
And, as elsewhere, it was/is often quite hard to discriminate, by their practice, who was ostensibly who. Peron, for example, was a classic Fascist. Yet is considered a "Hero" by many of the Castro/Chavez Coalition of the Swilling.
Somoza was a classic "strongman", having no discernible ideological vision to espouse, but was willing we should buy him fair and square.
The Pineapple was a basket case who tried all three forms, at once. Which incoherence, perhaps, conjoined with his exquisite bad timing in pushing it when Carter was already gone, landed him in our hospitable jails.
Chavez is another classic fascist, but the days of swashbuckling parades under Brown flags are seemingly history, and so he has wisely decided to go for that nice alliance of The Red and The Green. And on and on and on....
Of Thugs in government Latin America has always had no dearth. It is simple democrats, and those other naifs who actually believe in a humane and free society, who have been rara avis [and as soon as they start to be less rara, then the avis get culled pretty damn quick time].
The one true oddity, and so naturally one who takes a place of honor in Le Pew's Little Black Book, is Pinochet. He takes over from True Red Communist Allende, flexing his Military Strongman muscles. So, wonders the world, will he be a Fascist or one of those Ubi Mea Somozista types? But the bastard confounds us all and goes on to be absolutely untrue to Latin American form, and institutes a series of carefully planned and graded steps to a modern capitalist economy and a society which has both democracy and stability [once he chooses to leave the scene, of course]. And, wonder of wonders, he actually does what he plans and surrenders power. Well, let's just say that Castro, for one of many progressive examples, was not so foolish to make that mistake!
Alas, the bourgeois virtues of a decent economy and a civilized politics make for a Chile no self respecting Le Pew would wish to go and pepe in. And it patently dishonors the proud heritage of the People's governments long the hallmark of "Abasta Los Gringos" America. Why, left unapposed, this stinking corrupotion might even threaten to make a bourgeois of a Lula, eh? So let us join with Le Pew and rejoice at this Second Coming of the Caudillos.

7 comments:

The Darkroom said...

when i was growing up, there was this adage that the vichy nostalgics would rehash any time people spoke against petain. It went along the lines that, during the occupation, at least trains arrived and left on time.

And so it goes with 9/11 (73) apologists: pinochet made a modest success of the Chilean economy, so what's a few decades of horrific HR violations?

An added irony is that this line of reasoning is held mostly in the US by those who profess great democratic aspirations for iraq. The same types are prompt to abandon the most fundamental corollaries of democracy if it fits their political purpose.

Arelcao Akleos said...

The beauty of a mind such as that of Le Pew is that he never lets actually reading what was posted interfere with his right to clutch dearly to the shibboleths of his youth. Viva Le Pepe

Tecumseh said...

Apologists? Who talked about apologizing for bringing down a budding commie regime? Perhaps the Soviet nostalgists and apologists.

As for Vichy, this reminds me of that great avatar of democratic aspirations, Georges Marchais. When a young lad, he volunteered to go work in the Reich's factories -- no doubt, helping build the arms to fight the despised Anglo-Saxons. Upon return, he toed the Party Line to a T, going with every zig and zag of Moscow Center, and justifying all the mass killings of the Soviets and their satellites. It was all in a great cause, for sure -- les lendemains qui chantent, and all that. Surely, he must have professed horror -- the horror ! -- at the human rigts violations of those who prevented Communism from subjugating yet another country, this time in South America. Perhaps Vichy nostalgia is fading by now, but the Marchais surely spirit lives on.

Arelcao Akleos said...

Not that he is original in that regard, of course ;)

Mr roT said...

AA, men your age using emoticons are highly suspect. :-D

The Darkroom said...

i have to disagree about marchais. while he was certainly philosphically a stal, his utter incompetence, stupidity and his uncanny ability to avoid answering questions from journalists make him one of the great comics of the 70s-80s. It helps of course that he was essentially harmless.

I regularly watch reruns of interviews of JP El Qabach interviewing Marchais to tremendous laughter.


Travailleurs, travailleuses, le grand capital vous spolie, le grand capital vous ment! what a trip.

Tecumseh said...

Jean-Pierre Elkabbach was good, indeed. I also remember him fondly.